Conclusions (contd.)

Slide 3 in this series. 

 

In analzing the history of the IPCC, their motives and policies as best exemplified by the Paris Accord, one can see how the intent of AGW is to make government more in charge of energy, the economy, all at a world scale.   As much of a delightful idea this is for some, there is no example where govenment has clearly regulated the society to solve a problem.  Please name one. 

slide 3 concl

The basic idea that man can control climate is our next stop.

 

Section for a video or follow-on comment

We should revisit occasionally what the proper role of government is.   As the constitution was a good sense of direction, we need a core set of principles to add in order to deal with the future.

 

So many want to engineer society, remove risk, assist certain groups, rather than let individuals thrive and raise communities.  Why?

 

Is Democracy where we all "get it good and hard" or is it the best means to a free society?

 

Should we roll with the special interests, or make the government achieve its proper role, what is that role, and how to do this?

 

When do deficits and governments become too large?

 

Government is becoming more elitist while trying to sell corrections to problems it created, what makes this possible?

 

Conclusions

 

 

 

This section offers some conclusions for all of the sections.  In other words what might someone come away with from all of these ideas.

 

Tutorial Conclusions

Topics Covered

Reality Check

Man Controlling Climate

Feedback

Historic Data Conclusions

Future Climate?

Bill Nye Solution

Consider These

CO2 has Fans

Waht Can You Do

 

 

 

Add Comments

 

Powered by Disqus