Tutorial Conclusions
Slide 1 in this series.
How does one arrive at overall conclusions? There is an art in this. Is science well served with bad theories and methods?
I hope that we have put forth a set of arguments and actual data and results that would give one pause when saying that the science is settled. For one thing in any scientific area the science is never settled. True scientists would celebrate and enjoy discussions with skeptics, but AGW has no interest in this discussion or debate.
The topics we have covered in all of these sections have been broad and comprehensive.
We should revisit occasionally what the proper role of government is. As the constitution was a good sense of direction, we need a core set of principles to add in order to deal with the future.
So many want to engineer society, remove risk, assist certain groups, rather than let individuals thrive and raise communities. Why?
Is Democracy where we all "get it good and hard" or is it the best means to a free society?
Should we roll with the special interests, or make the government achieve its proper role, what is that role, and how to do this?
When do deficits and governments become too large?
Government is becoming more elitist while trying to sell corrections to problems it created, what makes this possible?
This section offers some conclusions for all of the sections. In other words what might someone come away with from all of these ideas.
