Does AGW to the tune of over 3C by 2100 have the right assumptions?

Monckton sees the premise as false.   The satellite that was put up over 20 years ago was to measure the radiation.  If the earth warms what the satellite measured and scientists found was that the radiation went up.   Prof Lindzen went on to compare the results with the IPCC models. 


 The radiation measured was found to be 6x higher than what the IPCC models predict.   





Section for a video or follow-on comment

We should revisit occasionally what the proper role of government is.   As the constitution was a good sense of direction, we need a core set of principles to add in order to deal with the future.


So many want to engineer society, remove risk, assist certain groups, rather than let individuals thrive and raise communities.  Why?


Is Democracy where we all "get it good and hard" or is it the best means to a free society?


Should we roll with the special interests, or make the government achieve its proper role, what is that role, and how to do this?


When do deficits and governments become too large?


Government is becoming more elitist while trying to sell corrections to problems it created, what makes this possible?


Add Comments


Powered by Disqus