Short Climate Debate
Christy states the facts as is well recognized and Schmidt just reiterates the common AGW narrative that is not true but if repeated enough times apparently becomes true. Christy is a real climate scientist residing at Univ of Alabama at Huntsville and has been working on temperature and other data for decades. The UAH temperature data set is from his efforts. Gavin Schmidt is a high ranking official on NASA and the IPCC.
We should revisit occasionally what the proper role of government is. As the constitution was a good sense of direction, we need a core set of principles to add in order to deal with the future.
So many want to engineer society, remove risk, assist certain groups, rather than let individuals thrive and raise communities. Why?
Is Democracy where we all "get it good and hard" or is it the best means to a free society?
Should we roll with the special interests, or make the government achieve its proper role, what is that role, and how to do this?
When do deficits and governments become too large?
Government is becoming more elitist while trying to sell corrections to problems it created, what makes this possible?
These videos speak to the broad question of how good is the AGW theory and is it a crisis as predicted.
Monckton on the False Assumptions
Ridley on Greening of the World
Christy vs Schmidt Short Debate
