Paris Accord and Green Fund
More info for the mob. Obama without Congressional approval achieved the distinction below.
Example: so your kid says to you, Dad I made a commitment today, and you should be proud of me. I committed to give money to this dealer of future products that do not come on the market in your life time. But you have to put in funds now. Hope you are proud of me, for this is required to save some part of the environment. Not sure what part, but we should do what we can, right?
Anthony Watts / 2 hours ago June 3, 2017
Yeah, this is why President Trump said:
“We will cease honoring all non-binding agreements”, and “we will stop contributing to the green climate fund”.
“I cannot in good conscience support a deal that harms the United States”.
“The bottom line is that the Paris Accord is very unfair to the United States”.
“This agreement is less about climate and more about other countries getting a financial advantage over the United States”.
The United States contributed $1 billion to the global Green Climate Fund, but the world’s top polluters contributed nothing, David Asman reported.
We should revisit occasionally what the proper role of government is. As the constitution was a good sense of direction, we need a core set of principles to add in order to deal with the future.
So many want to engineer society, remove risk, assist certain groups, rather than let individuals thrive and raise communities. Why?
Is Democracy where we all "get it good and hard" or is it the best means to a free society?
Should we roll with the special interests, or make the government achieve its proper role, what is that role, and how to do this?
When do deficits and governments become too large?
Government is becoming more elitist while trying to sell corrections to problems it created, what makes this possible?
This could also be inserted into the field above, or erased
Currently as a society, we are having a most difficult time discussing political issues. What is driving this? And why a rebirth in political culture would be a good thing.
Are "markets" dead as some would conjecture? Or is free enterprise what got us here?
At the heart of economics there are several possible economic schools of thought, the essence of these schools of thought and how they relate to our lives.
